COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
AMD100-100001277WOF
▲ 532,563 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

VS
▲ 52206 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.3GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Effective Speed 
+97%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 5,716 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 606th / 1467
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
77 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 134% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 1467
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		59.9 % 118 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+97%
Average Score 
+245%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.7 Pts +4% 78.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		63.8 Pts 228 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+257%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		118 Pts 447 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+279%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		207 Pts 844 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+308%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		332 Pts 1,608 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+384%
Overclocked Score 
+216%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.3 Pts 93.1 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		75.9 Pts 243 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+220%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		142 Pts 486 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+242%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		251 Pts 950 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+278%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		425 Pts 1,857 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+337%
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 68,975,282 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0 % 0.05 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money 		51.8 % 93.6 % Hugely better value.
+81%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		53 % +2% 52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$471 Cheaper.
+27% 		$649
Nice To Haves 
+308%
Age
Newest 		122 Months 2 Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		95 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+44% 		170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		32 nm 4 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+88%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.3 GHz 4.3 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+30%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.3 GHz 5.7 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+33%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		426 Pts 4,748 Pts Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
+1,015%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		336 Pts 4,201 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+1,150%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Piledriver Zen5
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3+ AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None RDNA2
Conclusion 
Average Bench 59.9%
Average Bench 118%

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
5,639
77
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback