COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
AMDAD5700OKHJBOX
▲ 5726,774 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

VS
▲ 52405 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q1 2012.

Effective Speed 
+26%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 319,802 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 580th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
6,606 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 3.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 857th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		60.8 % Faster effective speed.
+26% 		48.3 %
Average Score 
+36%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81 Pts Lower memory latency.
+18% 		68.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		64.3 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+9% 		59.2 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		122 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14% 		107 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		221 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+35% 		164 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		341 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+104% 		167 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+34%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.8 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12% 		82 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		73.3 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+5% 		69.7 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		143 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15% 		124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		254 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+31% 		194 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		397 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+105% 		194 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+203%
Market Share
Based on 68,098,742 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+700% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		74.9 % Much better value.
+53% 		48.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		57 % Slightly more popular.
+10% 		52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$130 Much cheaper.
+51% 		$265
Nice To Haves 
+45%
Age
Newest 		140 Months Slightly more recent.
+6% 		149 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100% 		4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		32 nm 32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18% 		3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz +5% 4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		411 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+112% 		194 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		353 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+111% 		167 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Piledriver Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3+ FM2
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None 7660D
Conclusion 
Average Bench 60.8%
Average Bench 48.3%
ADVERTISEMENT

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD A10-5700 is a quad-core Trinity APU (combined CPU and GPU) based on launched in Q4 of 2012. The A10-5700 is reasonably power efficient with a TDP of 65 Watts. In terms of performance the A10-5700 scores an effective speed of 68 versus the A10-6800K’s 73. Its base clock speed is 3.4 GHz which automatically turbo boosts to 4.0 GHz when needed and is sufficient for most generic desktop applications. The integrated HD 8670 Graphics are comparable to Intel's recent HD offerings. The A10-5700 offers reasonable performance at a reasonable price point. But comparing the A10-6700 and i3-4330 shows that the comparably priced 4330 is a far more compelling alternative given its almost outright advantage on every metric. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
313,196
6,606
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback