Today's hottest deals
AMD
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
  

3 Cores, 6 Threads.
Release date ≤ Q2 2014.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 7,378 user samples
1,739 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 697th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 607th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
55.4 % 59.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.5 Pts 81.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
61.3 Pts 63.8 Pts +4%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
113 Pts 118 Pts +4%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
192 Pts 207 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
247 Pts 332 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+34%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.9 Pts 91.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
70.9 Pts 75.9 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
132 Pts 142 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+8%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
217 Pts 251 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
280 Pts 425 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+52%
Market Share
Based on 68,935,193 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 53 % +4%
Age
Newest
126+ Months 122 Months +3%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
282 Pts 426 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+51%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
249 Pts 336 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+35%

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback