Today's hottest deals
AMDAD750KWOHJBOX
IntelBX8071512100F

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 17,742 user samples
5,882 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 4.1 GHz
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 791st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
11,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 135th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
51.1 % 94.1 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+84%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
72.7 Pts 83.8 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
60.9 Pts 172 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+182%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
110 Pts 323 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+194%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
172 Pts 565 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+228%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
175 Pts 788 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+350%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
84.5 Pts 91 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
72.2 Pts 178 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+147%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 344 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+159%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
217 Pts 647 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+198%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
216 Pts 823 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+281%
Market Share
Based on 68,929,502 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.35 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
84.2 % 132 % Much better value.
+57%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 92 % Much more popular.
+70%
Price
Price (score)
$45 Much cheaper.
+44%
$80
Age
Newest
144 Months 34 Months Much more recent.
+76%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
100 Watts 58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+42%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz +3% 3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
216 Pts 828 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+283%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
175 Pts 795 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+354%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Alder Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FM2 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The Athlon II X4 750K is not about outright speed, it's about value for money. As a result of its relatively weak single core performance, which is around 26% slower than the 3225, the 750K scores in the bottom 34% for real world consumer performance. The Intel competitors offer far snappier response times but only if you are prepared to pay around 70% more. If you are on a super tight budget the 750K may well be the best option but for most consumer orientated tasks it's probably worth paying a little more. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback