Today's hottest deals
AMDAD5700OKHJBOX
AMD100-100000025BOX

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q1 2012.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.9GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 147,728 user samples
6,606 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 3.4 GHz
Worst Bench: 37% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 37% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 869th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
141,122 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 78% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 78% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 180th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
48.3 % 87 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+80%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
68.4 Pts 76.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
59.2 Pts 141 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+138%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
107 Pts 276 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+158%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
164 Pts 524 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+220%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
167 Pts 922 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+452%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
82 Pts 88.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
69.7 Pts 148 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+112%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
124 Pts 293 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+136%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
194 Pts 572 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+195%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
194 Pts 1,034 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+433%
Market Share
Based on 69,003,841 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.24 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
48.9 % 97.4 % Hugely better value.
+99%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 67 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$265 $185 Much cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
154 Months 64 Months Much more recent.
+58%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+78%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.9 GHz Faster base frequency.
+15%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4.5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
194 Pts 1,506 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+676%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
167 Pts 1,401 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+739%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FM2 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
7660D None

The AMD A10-5700 is a quad-core Trinity APU (combined CPU and GPU) based on launched in Q4 of 2012. The A10-5700 is reasonably power efficient with a TDP of 65 Watts. In terms of performance the A10-5700 scores an effective speed of 68 versus the A10-6800K’s 73. Its base clock speed is 3.4 GHz which automatically turbo boosts to 4.0 GHz when needed and is sufficient for most generic desktop applications. The integrated HD 8670 Graphics are comparable to Intel's recent HD offerings. The A10-5700 offers reasonable performance at a reasonable price point. But comparing the A10-6700 and i3-4330 shows that the comparably priced 4330 is a far more compelling alternative given its almost outright advantage on every metric. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 3800X is an 8-core, 16-thread high end desktop Zen 2 processor, built on AMD’s seminal 7nm manufacturing process. It has a boost clock speed of 4.5 GHz, overtaking the previous Zen+ flagship, the Ryzen 7 2700X, by 200 MHz and around 16% in terms of effective speed. The 3800X is available at launch for $399 USD alongside four other new Zen 2 processors, including the similarly specified Ryzen 7 3700X. The main differences between the 3800X and 3700X being an extra 100 MHz of boost clock frequency on the 3800X and extra TDP headroom (105W for the 3800X versus 65W for the 3700X) for a $70 USD premium. The 21% higher release price translates to just a 2% higher effective speed over the 3700X. The 3800X is in direct competition with Intel’s i7-9700K, benchmarks show that, when overclocked, the 3800X is 10% worse for gaming but 30% faster for 64-core processing. The 3800X is also 15% ($50 USD) more expensive than the i7-9700K. Additionally, the 3800X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. Like the other third generation Ryzen processors, the 3800X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 chipset as well as the 400 and 300 series motherboards. At $380 USD, the 3800X offers reasonable value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback