Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 02:24
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 50.6 2-Core 101 51% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 18 Parallax 4.81 13% 12.8 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 18 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 422 381 365 366 371 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 13GB free, PID 8461 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 30.8 Write 31.1 Mixed 30 SusWrite 31.6 42% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.1 212% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB 5,337 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 738GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 28 Write 25.6 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 29.9 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.6 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16