Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 116
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 127
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2682) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 216 133 126 115 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 482
Write 319
Mixed 286
SusWrite 162
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 41.7
145% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 260
200% 277 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback