Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 88.3
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 93.8
51% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 186
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 40.7
29% 36.5 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 28.1
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1CS1754D11 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 188 183 187 188 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 222
Write 185
Mixed 175
SusWrite 178
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 26.6
104% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 41
40% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
13GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.7 8.2 8.8 8.5 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15.8
Write 10.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.5
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback