Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 02:50
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 923
82% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,294
80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 116
Parallax 105
89% 110 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 101
Splatting 83
75% 93 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,235
Write 609
Mixed 732
189% 859 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 17.6
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 18.1
25% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 119%
Great: 288%
Amd-raid Array 4 249GB
232GB free
Firmware: 9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,923
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,855
463% 2,102 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 35.9
170% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 23.3
52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 267%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33.1
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback