Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage Formula (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '18 at 01:20
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 64.7 42% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 64.4 8-Core 65.8 9% 65.1 Pts	64-Core 66.7 4% 66.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Lighting 76.4 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 65.4 62% 72.3 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 71.5 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 38 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 59 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 471725596	51.6% Above average	Read 232 Write 189 Mixed 183 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 19.8 95% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 20.2 25% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 108541584 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 78 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11215385 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 395 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 68 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 55 656539687 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1305 (C2) HDA temperature 39 45 64424509479 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 129630702928234 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3202818166 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2713920115	108% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 184 Mixed 110 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.18 84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149 6,960 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 182GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 89 81261657 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1563 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 314033292 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16161 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1112 (BB) vendor-specific 56 56 44 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 49 757465133 (C2) HDA temperature 45 51 64424509485 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 77 53 169317192 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 87 240 13	40.9% Average	Read 74 Write 68.5 Mixed 22.9 40% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%
Kingston DT microDuo 3C 124GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 115GB free, PID 16ae Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.4% Terrible	Read 33.3 Write 9.97 Mixed 10.5 18% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.45 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.03 22% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	36x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	35x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $113Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	95x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	20x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353