Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 01:20
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 64.7
42% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 64.4
8-Core 65.8
9% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 66.7
4% 66.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 65.4
62% 72.3 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 71.5
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 232
Write 189
Mixed 183
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 19.8
95% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 20.2
25% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 184
Mixed 110
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.18
84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
182GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 74
Write 68.5
Mixed 22.9
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.26
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
Kingston DT microDuo 3C 124GB
115GB free, PID 16ae
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Read 33.3
Write 9.97
Mixed 10.5
18% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.45
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
22% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback