Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration552 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 33.7
30% 32.6 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 387
Mixed 405
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 43.7
155% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 75.2
99% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
435GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 143
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.26
124% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 108%
ASMT 2115 1TB
785GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 170
Write 157
Mixed 115
183% 147 MB/s
4K Read 7.65
4K Write 3.28
4K Mixed 0.51
157% 3.81 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 500GB
192GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 107
Write 116
Mixed 7.22
90% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.18
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback