Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B88
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 169
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 342
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8B88) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 10.5
7% 10 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 7.9
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZH 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 642 659 774 670 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 881
Mixed 910
SusWrite 458
177% 787 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 35.4
142% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 161
119% 161 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 114%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43CB1-CWE 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 28 60 14" 1280 720 LGD0725
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback