Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B5F
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 11:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 57.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 276
81% 157 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 943
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B5F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.10
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 24.4
13% 18 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 20.5
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 689 704 829 837 836 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 994
Write 842
Mixed 860
SusWrite 777
195% 868 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 39.7
125% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 498
318% 368 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 140%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43CB1-CWE 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 AUO229E
Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback