HP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AC7
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 17:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500-$228
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 200
2-Core 402
118% 227 Pts
4-Core 788
8-Core 1,350
130% 1,069 Pts
64-Core 2,209
137% 2,209 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 114%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8AC7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 11.1
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZH 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 1507 1533 869 461 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,578
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 991
302% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 91.1
321% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 1511
DQ Mixed 592
565% 848 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 263%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 25% 53 104 58 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Pro Tower 400 G9 PCI Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback