Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '24 at 19:33
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 78 2-Core 152 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 426 43% 348 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 20.5 18% 19.9 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lenovo E660 SSD-2.5-256G 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 466 Write 279 Mixed 234 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 0.8 26% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 100%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 453GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 64 64 64 63 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 61.1 Write 66 Mixed 44 SusWrite 60.1 43% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C8-4GAB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G F3-1600C8-4GAB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.6% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23.8"	1280 720	PHL0929 PHL 241B8Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	380x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16