Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 19:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 303
83% 161 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 719
76% 609 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 5.9
4% 6.73 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3858
Write 3,248
Mixed 2,441
706% 3,183 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 80.1
306% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 1,038
784% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 261% Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 57.5
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 48.9
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 165 16" 1280 720 AUOD7A7
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback