Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 00:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 187
2-Core 372
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 749
8-Core 1,262
122% 1,006 Pts
64-Core 2,154
133% 2,154 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 106
Parallax 140
130% 135 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 104
Splatting 90
94% 119 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 441 392 378 453 419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 3,603
Write 1,798
Mixed 1154
SusWrite 454
384% 1752 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 68.1
279% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1291
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 1,174
852% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 304%
Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 49.3
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 28
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 165 16" 1536 889 AUOD7A7
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback