Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 18:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 188
2-Core 371
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 731
8-Core 883
104% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 104
Parallax 123
112% 121 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 100
Splatting 82.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 371 345 338 149 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 495
Mixed 742
SusWrite 306
227% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 82.7
331% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 429
412% 664 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 261%
Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40S5.C8A1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 52.4
156% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 29.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 141%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 HPN3968 OMEN 27qs
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback