Today's hottest deals

Alienware m16 R1 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 261%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m16 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0YT34N
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 21:45
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 204
2-Core 409
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 784
8-Core 1,508
136% 1,146 Pts
64-Core 2,513
156% 2,513 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BFE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 278
Parallax 302
236% 290 fps
MRender 424
Gravity 242
Splatting 187
221% 284 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 205%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$279
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2394 3643 4221 4339 4255 4247 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 3,976
Mixed 3,204
SusWrite 3,850
731% 3,200 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 103
344% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 1,226
DQ Mixed 1,395
1,047% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 475%
Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$279
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4224 4541 4599 4574 4568 4742 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
582% Outstanding
Read 2,821
Write 4,513
Mixed 3,331
SusWrite 4,541
864% 3,802 MB/s
4K Read 75.4
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 116
402% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 1,692
DQ Write 1,334
DQ Mixed 1,500
1,126% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 582%
Great: 616%
Wd_black SN770M 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3751 3687 3671 3314 3603 2959 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
548% Outstanding
Read 3,896
Write 3,666
Mixed 2,723
SusWrite 3,498
775% 3,445 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 78.7
297% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 2,243
DQ Write 1,728
DQ Mixed 1,943
1,465% 1,971 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 548%
Great: 548%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 50.9
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 47.3
SC Write 64.7
SC Mixed 51.3
156% 54.4 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 157%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 5R 7G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 26% 72 219 60 240 15.9" 1707 1067 BOE0B04
History: Score 55: 0P 4R 10G 5B | Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B | Score 47: 0P 5R 7G 1B
Typical m16 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Alienware m16 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback