Today's hottest deals

Alienware m18 R1 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m18 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0WGV87
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 170
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 547
50% 418 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Dell(1028 0C4A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.22
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 1024GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1274 1287 1292 1272 1304 1293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,261
Mixed 1,432
SusWrite 1,287
311% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 32.1
106% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 434
284% 342 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 187%
Great: 445%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 33.2
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 10% 39 213 55 480 18" 1920 1129 CMN18A0
Typical m18 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback