Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 9  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 9
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 48.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 235
72% 137 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 703
65% 546 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Microsoft(1414 0063) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.3118
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 25.6
18% 24.8 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 19.9
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN770M 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1065 834 1232 1213 1205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,170
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,097
266% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 45
149% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 326
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 182%
Great: 548%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 45.8
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 121%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13" 1280 720 LGD0719
Typical Surface Pro 9 Builds (Compare 944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback