Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG Z590 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D08
MotherboardMSI MAG Z590 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D08)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$450
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,134
104% 872 Pts
64-Core 2,007
124% 2,007 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$399
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 120
98% 120 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 120
Splatting 119
98% 120 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 1TB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1191 1197 1194 1203 1205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 78.8
Write 1,197
Mixed 503
SusWrite 1,197
172% 744 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 38.1
161% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 731
599% 860 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 166%
Great: 347%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
82GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 55 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 63.6
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 54.8
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
122GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 95.7
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 30 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical MAG Z590 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D08) Builds (Compare 5,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z590 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback