Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 07:38
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 206
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 615
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 75
Parallax 68.5
56% 70.7 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 67.7
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 1TB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 353 364 369 363 366 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 337
Write 404
Mixed 339
SusWrite 367
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 23.3
122% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 176
178% 289 MB/s
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
242GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 428 425 419 420 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 398
Mixed 243
SusWrite 423
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 39.7
147% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 245
211% 312 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 111%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 299 297 298 297 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 411
Mixed 366
SusWrite 315
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 38.9
152% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 156
125% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 124%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
109GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 52 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 50
Write 45.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 51.5
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170M-D3H - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback