Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Hydra G60

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Hydra G60  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B760-PLUS D4
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 13:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$163
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 186
2-Core 374
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,197
113% 940 Pts
64-Core 1,625
101% 1,625 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$295
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 120
Parallax 159
138% 149 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
119% 152 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SOLIDIGM SSDPFKN 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,064
Write 2,995
Mixed 1,894
521% 2,318 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 114
401% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 23.6
127% 265 MB/s
Poor: 171% Great: 357%
Generic External 250GB
185GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.5
Write 34
Mixed 25.5
44% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 41.9
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 32.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 8G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 44% 36 218 59 60 21.5" 1920 1009 SAM0B3F S22D300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback