Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16FK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive12.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GX60 1AC
MotherboardMSI MS-16FK  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120827
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 10:18
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample Mobile 2185_A1
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Memory 3.22
1-Core 10.1
2-Core 24.3
6% 12.5 Pts
4-Core 46.3
8-Core 54.9
6% 50.6 Pts
64-Core 54.8
3% 54.8 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 83 88 88 86 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.5% Very poor
Read 102
Write 84.6
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 86.9
20% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 3
10% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
60GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 89 98 95 95 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.2% Very poor
Read 101
Write 96.5
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 96.3
20% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 2.9
11% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSH-8G JM1333KSH-8G 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 3.3
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 472
8% 472 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 64 0" 1280 720
Typical MS-16FK Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback