Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16FK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMicro-Star GX60 3CC
MotherboardMSI MS-16FK  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 21:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample Mobile 2185_A1
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 118
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 190
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
MSI(1462 10DA) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A240G 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 505
Write 190
Mixed 252
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 15.9
84% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 54.8
64% 108 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
231GB free
Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 134
Mixed 118
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16FK Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback