Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16FK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GX60 1AC
MotherboardMSI MS-16FK  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130903
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 03:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 64
43% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 146
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
MSI(1462 10DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.03
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 65 44 15 7 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43% Average
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 38.3
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSH-8G JM1333KSH-8G 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16FK Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback