Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 16:23
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5775C-$170
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 511
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 102
56% 78 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 48.5
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 373 369 381 374 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 324
Write 382
Mixed 332
SusWrite 372
80% 352 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 37.9
122% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 132
137% 225 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86%
Great: 124%
DAS TerraMaster 5TB
525GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 54 55 54 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 118
Write 124
Mixed 48
SusWrite 54.9
19% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
15% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
305GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 8 8 7.9 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 38.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 7.9
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 1TB
76GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 75.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 52
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 88%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 70 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 123
Write 88.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 70.7
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
414% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB
395GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 66 66 66 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 99.5
Write 111
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 66.1
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
323GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8 8.1 8 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 38.9
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 8.1
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 127%
Tdas TerraMaster 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.9 8.1 8 8.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 38
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 8.2
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 120%
Tdas TerraMaster 2TB
418GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.3 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 36.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 8.2
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 92%
Tdas TerraMaster 4TB
281GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 40
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 7.8
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 111%
DAS TerraMaster 500GB
31GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.1 8 8 8.1 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 39.1
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 8.1
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 61%
Tdas TerraMaster 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 39.7
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 8.1
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 77%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
876GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 7.9 8 8 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 36.1
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 8.1
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 3,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback