Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 00:46
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 K 875-$174
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 82.6
47% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 250
24% 198 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
EVGA(3842 C873) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 3.81
8% 7.16 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 6.48
6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 206 164 165 170 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
6GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 27
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 2.6
16% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 127%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 98 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 95.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 97.7
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 98%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2 1.9 2 2 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 26
Write 26
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 1.9
15% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 500GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 9.8
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 2.3
9% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 61%
DAS TerraMaster 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2 2 2 2 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.64% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 2
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 88%
DAS TerraMaster 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 2.5
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 88%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
626GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 157
Mixed 89
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
379% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback