Today's hottest deals

Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 681
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Asus(1043 8747) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 112
Parallax 125
99% 120 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 117
Splatting 106
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 451 458 474 473 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 450
Mixed 406
SusWrite 460
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 41.8
141% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 356
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 107%
Great: 121%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
76GB free
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 424 422 430 430 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,185
Write 1,181
Mixed 1,004
SusWrite 443
214% 954 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.3
190% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 675
496% 661 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 163%
Great: 187%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 84 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 85.4
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 86%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 173 173 181 179 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 186
Mixed 135
SusWrite 176
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.8
474% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 167 174 171 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback