Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 22:31
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 58.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 264
81% 153 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 973
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,904
118% 1,904 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$219
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 88
Parallax 82.6
75% 87.4 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 70.4
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 209 100 193 228 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 397
Write 316
Mixed 320
SusWrite 201
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 27.1
59% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 155
130% 188 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 101%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
228GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 295 372 326 306 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 430
Write 284
Mixed 333
SusWrite 330
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 26.6
93% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 180
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 124%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 1140 1591 1370 1269 1486 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,341
Write 1,045
Mixed 1,073
SusWrite 1,378
324% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 43.2
128% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,548
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 1,353
1,028% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 280%
Great: 578%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 117 131 111 116 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 116
Write 158
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 120
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1
48% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 1.9
3% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 70 81 69 77 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 56
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 74.1
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 90%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
100GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 39 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 68
Write 19.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 35.6
46% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback