Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.10GHz 18 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 123 52% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 463 42% 352 Pts	64-Core 772 48% 772 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 155 Parallax 145 136% 155 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 128 Splatting 111 108% 135 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 136%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MZ7WD480HCGM00D5 480GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM92M3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 216 229 231 233 232 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 241 Write 230 Mixed 193 SusWrite 223 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 23.9 79% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 176 136% 184 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG 8x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 28.7 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	240x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	220x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	53x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	146x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373