Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 00:15
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.10GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 116
52% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 552
49% 414 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 28
Parallax 30.2
32% 32.6 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 32.9
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
453GB free
Firmware: S0318A0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1392 1386 1332 127 233 221 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 1,400
Mixed 897
SusWrite 782
258% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 21.9
134% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 508
369% 476 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 168%
Great: 264%
NE-512 512GB
470GB free
Firmware: S0318A0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 1407 1411 1399 260 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 1,395
Mixed 952
SusWrite 1,018
270% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 22.4
132% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 502
370% 484 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 179%
Great: 264%
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 192 191 193 189 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 452
Write 403
Mixed 246
SusWrite 194
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 36.1
125% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 234
200% 296 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback