Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '23 at 23:24
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 86 1-Core 145 2-Core 284 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 563 8-Core 966 93% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,509 93% 1,509 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)	128% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 165 Parallax 165 134% 165 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 165 Splatting 165 135% 165 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 64 79 98 79 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 435 Write 90.6 Mixed 136 SusWrite 84.7 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 30 112% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 168 145% 220 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$149 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 522GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1360 1257 1226 1217 1187 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2,286 Write 2,121 Mixed 1,657 SusWrite 1,279 412% 1,836 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 65.1 223% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1137 DQ Write 880 DQ Mixed 1,032 766% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 791GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 117 119 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 181 Write 144 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 119 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 19.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 21.8 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,080x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $153Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	683x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	312x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	416x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	323x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	267x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,534

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16