Today's hottest deals

MSI G41M4 (MS-7592)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7592
MotherboardMSI G41M4 (MS-7592)  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 12:58
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 68.8
41% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Nvidia(10DE 089E) 1GB
CLim: 648 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 10.5
10% 12.1 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 15
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 207
Write 116
Mixed 154
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 12.9
74% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 14.2
24% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
903GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 174
Mixed 140
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.35
140% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD321KJ 320GB
256GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 26
Mixed 27.1
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.38
56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M4 (MS-7592) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI G41M4 (MS-7592)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback