HP 320-1030

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP 320-1030 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2ACB
Memory	2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110817
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '17 at 21:33
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80 2,796 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 61.4 34% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 59 8-Core 70.9 8% 64.9 Pts	64-Core 67.5 4% 67.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2ACB) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$15 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 55 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 88 88 64 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131077 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 178	41.8% Average	Read 201 Write 237 Mixed 249 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 6.21 58% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 6.06 21% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 87%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 13GB free, PID 0823 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 6.4 Mixed 6.7 11% 9.99 MB/s	4K Read 3.45 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.005 13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 10.9 Mixed 13.4 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.08 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 12% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 320-1030 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 320-1030

CPU
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	6x
A8-3820 APUAMDBench 44%, 1,243 samples	1x
A6-3620 APUAMDBench 41%, 2,758 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 36%, 1,063 samples	2x
EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 35%, 481 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16