Gigabyte GA-A55M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130319
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 23.6
35% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 62.8
7% 54.9 Pts
64-Core 46.6
3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.49 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 190507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 108 59 53 67 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 138
Write 80
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 84.7
21% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 10.5
34% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
137GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 119 115 114 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 84.6
Write 75.8
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 117
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A55M-DS2 - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback