MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 06:44
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,014
95% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,481
92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 89.2
0% 51 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 46.3
47% 59.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 88 50 122 98 1.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 461
Write 438
Mixed 372
SusWrite 113
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 40.3
162% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 220
185% 267 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
300GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 129
Write 140
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 88
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 82%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
10GB free, PID 0823
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.4
11% 9 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 19
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 16.2
30% 24 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.9
194% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback