Performance Results

Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$211
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 726
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 1131
70% 1131 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 96
52% 73 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 45.9
49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 91 42 93 9.5 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 398
Write 117
Mixed 200
SusWrite 77.5
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 14.2
93% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 88.9
93% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 96%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SN11842
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 434 431 435 436 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 474
Mixed 442
SusWrite 436
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 39
140% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 171
138% 189 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
75GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 73 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 85.7
Write 91.4
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 78.1
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 3600 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 16.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 64%
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 57%

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback