Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210309
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 19:39
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 764
73% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 103
Parallax 92.3
74% 95.3 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 91.5
74% 90.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
23GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 413
Write 395
Mixed 353
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 45.8
156% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 744 768 730 751 758 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 1,729
Mixed 784
SusWrite 799
272% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 44.6
169% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 711
523% 692 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 192%
Great: 302%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 127 126 129 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 116
Write 150
Mixed 107
SusWrite 127
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 1.4
4% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 47%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137
527GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 83 81 76 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 73 66 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 142
Write 148
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 64.4
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 92%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 133 126 129 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 105
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 129
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$195
723GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 90 85 90 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 84.1
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 87.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
229% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$195
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 130 147 153 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 111
Write 117
Mixed 68
SusWrite 144
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.3
222% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GFX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2472 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback