Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Memory 8.26 1-Core 12.4 2-Core 51.3 11% 24 Pts	4-Core 69.5 8-Core 85.1 10% 77.3 Pts	64-Core 98.1 6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5086) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0109AELA SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 286 285 244 280 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 357 Write 272 Mixed 237 SusWrite 262 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 13.7 37% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 189 138% 182 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.9 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 420 10% 420 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x

SSD
TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GBKbg40zmt128gBench 107%, 1,367 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBSamsungBench 59%, 26,293 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16