Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 21.5 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 78.5 24% 45.1 Pts	4-Core 94.6 8-Core 96.9 13% 95.8 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 117 65 45 55 39 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 231 Write 232 Mixed 209 SusWrite 59.3 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 13.2 47% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 37.5 66% 129 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 151%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 310 13% 310 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	89x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	49x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	161x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	84x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	37x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	145x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	28x
DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 35 samples	23x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16