Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81WQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 38.3
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 58.5
29% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 58.3
6% 50 Pts
64-Core 58.1
4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 3FB4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LFM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 11 6.9 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 30
Mixed 28
SusWrite 12.9
14% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81WQ Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback