Gigabyte GA-H370N WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H370 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370N WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 55.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
82% 160 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 846
87% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.4
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 222 222 223 218 221 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,311
Write 872
Mixed 891
SusWrite 236
184% 828 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 55.9
192% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 667
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 577
468% 657 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 157%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5743-031.A00G 9905743-045.A00G 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370N WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370N WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback