Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 192
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 365
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.17.10.4229
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 206 6.3 4.7 72 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27% Poor
Read 373
Write 314
Mixed 7
SusWrite 60
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$47
171GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 57.3
Write 24.5
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 24.9
40% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 5.4
253% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273BH1-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback