Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 01:04
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 49.3
31% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 95.1
8-Core 147
15% 121 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 147
54% 91.3 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 105
Splatting 83.3
78% 96.9 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 214 223 224 226 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 297
Write 288
Mixed 233
SusWrite 212
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 13.5
44% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 134
104% 144 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 121%
MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: KPYAIR3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 502 561 572 590 593 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 1,090
Mixed 790
SusWrite 551
185% 821 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 16.6
57% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 189
141% 189 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 312%
Intel SSDPEDME016T4S 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8DV1RA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 463 530 539 555 550 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 514
Write 982
Mixed 464
SusWrite 512
140% 618 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 17.7
60% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 186
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 271%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 120 121 125 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 75.5
Write 109
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 120
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 40.6
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback