Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 05:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 612
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 86.2
35% 61.7 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 57.5
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 373 356 284 268 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 465
Write 452
Mixed 316
SusWrite 319
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 35.3
122% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 223
166% 219 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 121%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 124 122 125 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 91.5
Write 120
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 121
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
175% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 43.4
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback