Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 91.3
44% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 167
18% 143 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 939 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 69.9
43% 60.9 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 36.8
36% 45.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS820S 240GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.3 3.1 5.5 6.8 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
218GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 168 168 169 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 120
Write 95
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 169
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1866, 1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback