Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 18:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 179
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 537
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 107
Parallax 112
92% 111 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 101
Splatting 91.6
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 90 45 28 79 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 244
Write 226
Mixed 200
SusWrite 82.1
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 14.7
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 32.2
35% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 60%
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T0214B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1128 1063 1070 374 76 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 1,154
Mixed 839
SusWrite 643
217% 969 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 23.8
131% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 330
258% 353 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 143%
Great: 156%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
257GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 132 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 133
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
378GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 104 100 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 40.7
Write 104
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 105
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
175% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 9.A 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback