Today's hottest deals

Asus X200CA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X200CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200CA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 50.6
37% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 65.8
9% 65.9 Pts
64-Core 62.1
4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 138D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 111 66 52 48 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 365
Write 300
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 104
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 3.8
31% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 30
46% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X200CA Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback